This article continues the series dedicated to the CQRS pattern. We will be looking at the Command Query Responsibility Segregation pattern as an architecture, particularly dive into the Querying part and try to find out how to fit it in the HTTP. At the time this article is written, two main protocol versions exist HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2. Version 3.0 is in the draft, so we are not considering it. The main difference between 1.

This article starts the series dedicated to CQRS on top of HTTP. We will be looking at the Command Query Responsibility Segregation pattern as an architecture, particularly dive into the Commanding part and try to find out how to fit it in the HTTP. At the time this article is written, two main protocol versions exist HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2. Version 3.0 is in the draft, so we are not taking it into consideration.

Command Query Responsibility Segregation This pattern gains popularity lately. And there’re certain benefits of using it as well as drawbacks. I would like to share my own experiences and thoughts on this topic. ℹ️ Don’t forget to check out more advanced series dedicated to appliying CQRS architectural patter on top of HTTP [CQRS via HTTP]. The series covers in depth main actors of the pattern, such as Commanding and Querying, as well as how do they fit in the HTTP.